Home OpinionDid Jomo Kenyatta Fight for Kenya’s Freedom or Serve the Colonial Machine?

Did Jomo Kenyatta Fight for Kenya’s Freedom or Serve the Colonial Machine?

By: Ali AwDoll
Jomo Kenyatta

Just days after Mashujaa Day on October 20—a holiday once called Kenyatta Day, self-styled to crown Jomo Kenyatta as the face of uhuru but later reclaimed to honor Kenya’s true heroes, the Mau Mau fighters and unsung rebels—Kenyatta’s legacy still divides the nation. His name was embossed on currency, and now on streets, airports and institutions, celebrated as the architect of independence in 1963. Yet the truth cuts deeper: was Kenyatta a liberator who broke British chains, or a collaborator who traded the blood of Mau Mau martyrs like Bildad Kaggia and Jaramogi Oginga Odinga for power?

His exile, detention, and presidency—marked by privilege, compromise, and repression—reveal a man who played both revolutionary and puppet, leaving behind a legacy both triumphant and treacherous.

Sussex and the Seeds of Struggle

The colonial myth casts Kenyatta as the mastermind of Mau Mau, but his pre-emergency years tell a murkier story. During World War II (1939–1945), as Kikuyu men faced forced labor and conscription, Kenyatta was in Sussex, England, far from the struggle. He evaded military service, working as a farmhand while lecturing on Pan-Africanism alongside Kwame Nkrumah. It was exile in the heart of the empire that sharpened his anti-colonial voice, yet also detached him from the ground fire smoldering back home.

By 1946, he returned to lead the Kenya African Union (KAU), demanding land and voting rights and dodging settler death threats. But when the Mau Mau uprising erupted in 1952, Kenyatta distanced himself, calling it a “spoiler” and famously urging, “Let Mau Mau perish forever.”

Declassified MI5 files from 1953 reveal that British intelligence had “no evidence” linking him directly to Mau Mau, yet he was arrested on October 20, 1952—ironically, the date that would later become Kenyatta Day. Operation Jock Scott targeted him as a scapegoat to decapitate the independence movement.

Kapenguria and Detention: The Favoured Prisoner

Kenyatta and five others—Bildad Kaggia, Fred Kubai, Paul Ngei, Achieng’ Oneko, and Kung’u Karumba—were tried in Kapenguria and convicted on April 8, 1953, of “managing Mau Mau terrorism” based on perjured testimony. The Kapenguria Six were shipped to the desert prison of Lokitaung, condemned to hard labor, poor rations, and isolation.

Yet Kenyatta, already in his 60s, enjoyed comparative comfort: a cleaner cell, lighter duties, and a monthly family allowance of KSh 2,353—privileges denied to comrades like Kaggia, who endured the harshest treatment as a perceived radical.

Even during his later restriction in Lodwar (1959–1961), Kenyatta received family visits—Mama Ngina’s presence led to Uhuru’s conception around early 1961—access to newspapers, and medical care. By April 1961, at Maralal, he was meeting KANU leaders like Tom Mboya to plan Kenya’s transition to independence, while others like Kaggia remained under restriction.

The British saw Kenyatta as a “moderate” they could work with, unlike the “hardliners” such as Kaggia or Kubai. Divide-and-rule was their strategy, and it worked: by 1960, Kenyatta was their man for Lancaster House.

Betrayer of the Revolution

Kenyatta’s ascent to power in 1963 as prime minister, and then president in 1964, rode on the blood of Mau Mau but quickly turned its legacy into ash. Field Marshal Mwariama, a Meru freedom fighter who resisted until the end of the Emergency, died mysteriously in 1964—officially of “natural causes,” though whispers spoke of betrayal. His widow, Mukami, remained landless, still fighting for recognition decades later as Mashujaa Day sanitized her husband’s memory.

Bildad Kaggia, one of the purest ideologues of the struggle, broke with Kenyatta in 1962, accusing him of abandoning the landless for elite land grabs. His later work, Roots of Freedom (1971), would call Kenyatta’s government a “neocolonial farce.” Jaramogi Oginga Odinga—who had once led the cry of “No Uhuru Without Kenyatta”—was repaid with betrayal. By 1966, he was ousted from KANU, his Kenya People’s Union (KPU) banned in 1969, and himself detained in 1971 for advocating socialist land reforms.

Kenyatta’s government continued to brand Mau Mau as “terrorists” until 2003. His 1964 “amnesty” for forest fighters was a sham. In January 1965, his government ambushed Field Marshal Baimungi Marete and his fighters, who had rejected a 10,000-acre bribe to surrender. Their bodies were paraded at Kinoru Stadium in Meru—an eerie message to the revolutionaries: uhuru had come, but it no longer belonged to them.

Freedom’s Cost: Liberation or Collaboration?

Kenyatta’s admirers hail him for leading Kenya through Lancaster House, uniting KANU, and preserving stability amid regional turmoil. His Harambee call symbolized communal unity, and his reconciliation with settlers prevented civil war. But these achievements came at the expense of the very revolution that birthed him.

By silencing Odinga, crushing Baimungi, and marginalizing Kaggia, Kenyatta secured elite continuity—a peaceful handover for the British and a betrayal for the peasantry. The colonial state never died; it merely changed hands.

His name may still tower over institutions, roads, and landmarks—but every plaque and statue carries the shadow of Nyeri’s landless, Meru’s forgotten graves, and Odinga’s haunting words: “Not yet uhuru.”

Was Jomo Kenyatta the father of the nation—or the godfather of its compromise? As Kenyans mark Mashujaa Day, the question lingers in the country’s conscience. The truth lies not in his statues or speeches, but in the blood-soaked silence between them.

Uhuru came, but for whom?

Ali AwDoll is a Communication and Public Relations Expert specializing in strategic communication, storytelling, and media relations.

You may also like

Leave a Comment